Заключение
B будущем эффекты плацебо должны изучаться как в нейроисследованиях, так и в клинической практике и социальной психологии. Использование нового экспериментального дизайна и технологий позволит четко определить отношения между сложной умственной деятельностью (например, ожиданием) и различными нейрональными системами.
Это в свою очередь поможет разработать стратегический подход к проблемам, связанным с взаимодействием разума и тела не только в случае с болью, но и для ряда других состояний (таких, как психические заболевания) (Mayberg H. S. et al., 2002; Leuchter A. F., Cook I. A., Witte E. A., Morgan M. & Abrams M., 2002; Leuchter A. F. et al., 2004). B то же время, необходимо создать новый дизайн для проведения клинических испытаний, который позволил бы лучше понимать механизмы действия различных лекарств, а также новые терапевтические схемы, в которых можно было бы использовать сочетание препаратов и плацебо с целью снижения токсического воздействия лекарств и уменьшения побочных эффектов (Pollo A. et al., 2001), Наконец, необходимо дальнейшее изучение эффекта плацебо наюбщество для того, чтобы выявить положительные и отрицательные аспекты внушаемости человеческого разума.Списоклитературы
1. Лапин, И. П. Плацебо и терапия. Серия «Мир медицины». - СПб.: Издательство «Лань», 2000. Стр. 46-49.
2. Amanzio, M. & Benedetti, F. Neuropharmacological dissection of placebo analgesia: expectation-activated opioid systems versus conditioning-activated specific sub- systems.J. Neurosci. 19:484-494 (1999).
3. Benedetti, F. The opposite effects of the opiate antagonist naloxone and the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide on placebo analgesia. Pain. 64:535-543 (1996).
4. Benedetti, F. Cholecystokinin type-A and type-B receptors and their modulation of opioid analgesia. News Physiol Sci. 12:263-268 (1997).
5. Benedetti, F., et al.
The specific effects of prior opioid exposure on placebo analgesia and placebo respiratory depression. Pain. 75:313-319 (1998).6. Benedetti, F., et al. Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and
7. hormonal placebo/nocebo responses.J. Neurosci. 23:4315-43 23 (2003).
8. Benedetti, F., Amanzio, M. The neurobiology of placebo analgesia: from endogenous opioids to cholecystokinin. Prog Neurobiol. 52:109-125 (1997).
9. Benedetti1 F., Amanzio1 M.. Casadio1 C1 et al. Blockade of nocebo hyperalgesia by the cholecystokinin antagonist proglumide. Pain 71:135-140 (1997).
10. Benedetti,F.,Amanzio,M. & Maggi,G.Potentiationofplaceboanalgesia byproglumide. Lancet. 346:1231 (1995).
11. Benedetti1 F., Amanzio1 M., Baldi1 S., Casadio1 C. & Maggi1 G. Inducing placebo respiratory depressant responses in humans via opioid receptors. EurJ. Neurosci. 11:625-631 (1999).
12. Benedetti1 F., Pollo1 A., Lopiano1 L1 Lanotte1 M., Vighetti1 S., Rainero1 I. Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor and hormonal placebo/ nocebo responses.J Neurosci. 23:4315-23 (2003).
13. Benson1 H., Epstein1 M. D. The placebo effect. A neglected asset in the care of patient //JAMA.V. 232:1225-1227 (1975).
14. Bingel1 U., Lorenz1 J., Schoell1 E., Weiller1 C1 Buchel1 C. Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of subcortical antinociceptive network. Pain. 120(1- 2):8-15(2006).
15. Bromm1 B.,Jahnke, M.T.,Treede, R. D. Responses of human cutaneous afferents to C02 laser stimuli causing pain. Exp Brain Res. 55:158-66 (1984).
16. Bromm1 B.. Treede1 R. D. Nerve fiber discharges, cerebral potentials and sensations induced by C02 laser stimulation.
Hum NeurobioL 3:33-40 (1984).17. Bromm1 B., Scharein E., Vahle-Hinz1 C. Cortex areas involved in the processing of normal and alters pain. Prog Brain Res. 129:289-302 (2000).
18. Colloca1 L1 Benedetti1 F. Placebo and painkillers: is mind as real as matter? Nat Rev Neurosci. 6(7):245-52 (2005).
19. Colloca1 L1 Benedetti1 F. How prior experience shapes placebo analgesia. Pain. 124:126-33 (2006).
20. Colloca1 L1 Benedetti1 F. Nocebo hyperalgesia: how anxiety is turned into pain. Curr Opin An. 20:435-439 (2007).
21. Colloca1 L., Sigaudo1 M., Benedetti1 F. The role of learning on nocebo and placebo effects. Pain. 136:211-8 (2008).
22. Colloca1 L., Tinazzi1 M., Recchia1 S., Le Pera1 D., Fiaschi1 A., Benedetti1 F., Valeriani1 M. Learning potentiates neurophysiological and behavioral placebo analgesic responses. Pain, doi:10.1016 —1021(2008).
23. Fields, H. L & Price1 D. D. The placebo Effect: an Interdisciplinary Exploration (ed. Harrington,A.) 93-116 (Harvard Univ. Press1 Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA11997).
24. Fields, H. L & Basbaum,A. I.Textbook of Pain (eds.Wall, P. D. & Melzack1 R.) 309-329 (Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, UK11999).
25. Frot1 M., Rambaud1 L., Guenot1 M., Mauguie re1 F. Intracortical recordings of early pain- related C02-laser evoked potentials in the humansecond somatosensory (SII) area. Clin Neurophysiol. 110:133-45 (1999).
26. Garcia-Larrea1 L., Frot1 M., Valeriani1 M. Brain generators of laserevoked potentials: from dipoles to functional significance. Neurophysiol Clin. 33:279-92 (2003).
27. Gracely1 R. H.. Dubner1 R., Wolskee1 P.
J. & Deeter1 W R. Placebo and naloxone can alter postsurgical pain by separate mechanisms. Nature. 306: 264-265 (1983).28. Grevert1 R1 Albert, L H. & Goldstein1 A. Partial antagonism of placebo analgesia by naloxone. Pain. 16:129-143 (1983).
29. Hebb1 A. L. 0., Poulin1 J-F., Roach1 S. R1 et al. Cholecystokinin and endogenous opioid peptides: interactive influence on pain, cognition, and emotion. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 29:1225-1238 (2005).
30. Heinricher1 M. M., McGaraughty1 S.,Tortorici,V. Circuitry underlying antiopioid actions ofcholecystokinin within the rostralventromedial medulla.J NeurophysioL 85:280- 286 (2001).
31. Heinricher1 M. M., Neubert, Μ. J. Neural basis for the hyperalgesic action of cholecystokinin in the rostral ventromedial medulla.J Neurophysiol. 92:1982-1989 (2004).
32. Jones,A. K.,Watabe,H.,Cunningham,V.J.,Jones,T.Cerebraldecreasesinopioid receptor binding in patients with central neuropathic pain measured by [llC] diprenorphine binding and PET. EurJ Pain. 8:479-485 (2004).
33. Jones,A.K.,Cunningham,V.J.,Ha-Kawa,S.,Fujiwara,T.,Luthra,S.K.,Silva,S.,Derbyshire, S.,Jones,T. Changes in central opioid receptor binding in relation to inXammation and pain in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. BrJ Rheumatol. 33:909-16 (1994).
34. Keltner, J. R., Furst1 A., Fan1 C1 et al. Isolating the modulatory effect of expectation on pain transmission: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 26:4437-4443 (2006).
35. Kirsch11. Conditioning, expectancy and placebo effect: comment on Stewart-Williams and Podd. Psychol Bull. 2004;130:341-3(2004).
36. Kirsch11., Lynn1 S. J., Vigorito1 M.. Miller1 R. R. The role of conditioning in classical and operant conditioning.J Clin Psychol. 60:369-92 (2004).
37. Koyama1 T1 McHaffie1 J. G., Laurienti1 P. J., Coghill1 R. C. The subjective experience of pain: where expectations become reality. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 102:12950- 12955 (2005).
38. Leeuw1 M., Goossens1 M. E., Linton1 S. J., et al. The fear-avoidance model of musculoskeletal pain: current state of scientific evidence. J Behav Med. 30:77-94 (2007).
39. Lenz1 F. A., Rios1 M., Chau1 D., Krauss1 G. L1 Zirh1 T A., Lesser1 R. P. Painful stimuli evoke potentials recorded over th^human anterior cingulated gyrus.J NeurophysioL 79:2231-4 (1998).
40. leuchter, A. F., Cook1 I. A., Witte1 E. A., Morgan1 M. & Abrams1 M. Changes in brain function of depressed subjects during treatment with placebo. Am. J. Psychiatry. 159:122-129 (2002).
41. Leuchter1 A. F., et al. Pretreatment neurophysiological and clinical characteristics of placebo responders in treatment trials for major depression. Psychopharmacology. 177:15-22 (2004).
42. Levine1 J. D. & Gordon, N. C. Influence of the method of drug administration on analgesic response. Nature. 312:755-756 (1984).
43. Levine,J. D.,Gordon, N. C. & Fields1 H. L The mechanisms of placebo analgesia. Lancet. 2:654-657 (1978).
44. Lieberman1 M. D., et al. The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account. Neuroimage. 22:447-455 (2004).
45. Lipman,J.J., et al. Peak B endorphin concentration in cerebrospinal fluid: reduced in chronic pain patients and increased during the placebo response. Psychopharmacology. 102:112-116 (1990).
46. Lorenz1 J., Hauck1 M., Paur1 R. C., et al. Cortical correlates of false expectations during pain intensity judgments - a possible manifestation of placebo/nocebo cognitions.
Brain Behav lmmun. 19:283-295 (2005).47. Matre1 D., Casey1 K. L1 KnardahL S. Placebo-induced changes in spinal cord pain processing.J Neurosci. 26(2):559-563 (2006).
48. Mayberg1 H. S., et al. The functional neuroanatomy of the placebo effect. Am. J. Psychiatry. 159:728-737 (2002).
49. Mitchel1 J. M., Lowe1 D., Fields1 H. L The contribution of the rostral ventromedial medulla to the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine in restrained and unrestrained rats. Neuroscience. 87:123-133 (1998).
50. Montgomery, G. H., Kirsch1 I. Classical conditioning and the placebo effect. Pain. 72:107-13 (1997).
51. Oftedal1 G., Straume,A.,Johnsson,A.. Stovner1 L J. Mobile phone headache: a double blind,sham-controlled provocation study. Cephalalgia. 27:447-455 (2007).
52. Petrovic1 P., Kalso1 E., Petersson1 K. M. & Ingvar1 M. Placebo and opioid analgesia - imaging a shared neuronal network. Science. 295:1737-17 40 (2002).
53. Petrovic1 P. Opioid and placebo analgesia share the same network. Sem. Pain. Med. 3:31-36 (2005).
54. Ploghaus1 A., Tracey11., Gati1 J. S.. et aL Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science. 284:1979-1981 (1999).
55. Pollo1 A.. et al. Response expectancies in placebo analgesia and their clinical relevance. Pain. 93:77-84 (2001).
56. Pollo1A., Rainero1 l.,Vighetti, S. & Benedetti1 F. Placebo analgesia and the heart. Pain. 102:125-133 (2003).
57. Porro1 C. A., Baraldi1 R1 Pagnoni1 G., et al. Does anticipation of pain affect cortical nociceptive systems?J Neurosci. 22:3206-3214 (2002).
58. Price, D. D. (ed.) Psychological Mechanisms of Pain and Analgesia (IASR Seattle, Washington, USA11999).
59. Price1 D. D.. Craggs1 J., Nicholas Verne1 G., et al. Placebo analgesia is accompanied by large reductions in pain-related brain activity in irritable bowel syndrome patients. Pain. 127:63-72 (2007).
60. Price1 D. D.. Milling, L S., Kirsch11., Duff,A., Montgomery G. H., NicholU1 S. S. An analysis of factors that contribute to the magnitude of placebo analgesia in an experimental paradigm. Pain. 83:147-56 (1999).
61. Sawamoto1 N., Honda1 M., Okada1 T1 et al. Expectation of pain enhances responses to nonpainful somatosensory stimulation in the anterior cingulated cortex and parietal operculum/posterior insula: an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study.i Neurosci. 20:7438-7445 (2000).
62. Shapiro1 A. Placebogenesis and iatroplacebogenesis // Medical Times. V. 92. 1037- 1047 (1964).
63. Shapiro1 A. Psychochemotherapy // Biological Foundations of Psychiatry / Ed. R. G. Grenell1 S. Gabay N. Y.: Raven Press1793-835(1976).
64. Shapiro1 A. The placebo effect. Principles of Psychopharmacology N. Y.: Academic Press1441-459 (1978).
65. Tarkka1 I. M., Treede1 R. D. Equivalent electrical source analysis of pain-related somatosensory evoked potentiaU elicited by a C02 laser. J Clin Neurophysiol. 10:513-9 (1993).
66. Valeriani1 M., Rambaud1 L1 Mauguie re1 F. Scalp topography and dipolar source modeling of potentiaU evoked by C02 laser stimulation of the hand. Electroenceph Clin Neurophysiol. 100:343-53 (1996).
67. Vlaeyen1 J. W., Linton1 S. J. Fear-avoidance and its consequences in chronic musculoskeletal pain:a state ofthe art. Pain. 85:317-332 (2000).
68. Vogt1 B. A., Sikes1 R. W. & Vogt1 L. J. Neurobiology of Cingulate Cortex and Limbic Thalamus(eds.Vogt, B.A. & Gabriel1M.) 313-344 (Birkhauser,Boston,Massachusetts. USA11993).
69. Voudouris1 N. J., Peck1 C. L1 Coleman1 G. Conditioned placeboresponses. J Pers Soc Psychol. 48:47-53 (1985).
70. Voudouris1 N. J., Peck1 C. L1 Coleman1 G. Conditioned response models of placebo phenomena: further support. Pain 38:109-16 (1989).
71. Voudouris1 N. J., Peck1 C. L1 Coleman1 G. The role of conditioning and verbal expectancy in the placebo response. Pain. 43:121-8 (1990).
72. Wager1T D.,etal. Placebo-induced changes in fMRI inthe anticipation and experience of pain. Science. 303:116- 127 (2004).
73. Wager, T. D. The neural basis of placebo effects in anticipation and pain. Sem. Pain Med. 3:22-30 (2005).
74. Wager1 T. D., Matre, D., Casey, K. L Placebo effects in laser-evoked pain potentials. Brain Behav lmmun. 20(3):219-30 (2006).
75. Watson, A.. El-Dereby, W., Vogt, B. A., Jones, A. K. Placebo analgesia is not due to compliance or habituation: EEG and behavioural evidence. Neuroreport. 18:771-5 (2007).
76. Williams-Stewart, S., Podd, J. The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate. Psychol BulL 130:324-40 (2004).
77. Willoch, F., et al. Central pain after pontine infarction is associated with changes in opioid receptor binding: a PET study with llC-diprenorphine. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 20:686-690 (1999).
78. Willoch, F., et al. Central poststroke pain and reduced opioid receptor binding within pain processing circuitries: a [llC]dinorphine PET study. Pain. 108:213-220 (2004).
79. Zubieta, J. K., et al. Regional mu opioid receptor regulation of sensory and affective dimension of pain. Science. 293:311-315 (2001).
80. Zubieta, J. K., et al. COMT vall58met genotype affects μ-opioid neurotransmitter responses to a pain stressor. Science. 299:1240-1243 (2003).
81. Zubieta,J. K.,Bueller,J.A.,Jackson,L.R.,etaL Placebo effects mediated byendogenous opioid activity on m-opioid receptors.J Neurosci. 25:7754-7762 (2005).
82. Zubieta, J. K.. Yau1 W. Y., Scott, D. J., Stolher, C. S. Belief or need? Accounting for individual variations in the neurochemistry of the placebo eVect. Brain Behav lmmun. 20:15-26(2006).
4.4.
Еще по теме Заключение:
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- Заключение
- 2.5. Рациональное трудоустройство больных по заключению КЭК
- Патоморфологическое заключение