Список литературы

1. Алексеев, Б.Я. Лечение локализованного и местнораспространенного рака предстательной железы: дис. ... докт. мед. наук: 14.01.23 / Алексеев Борис Яковлевич. — М., 2006. - 259 с.

2. Аляев, Ю.Г. Выбор метода лечения при локализованном и

местнораспространенном раке предстательной железы / Ю.Г. Аляев, Е.А. Безруков, Г.Е. Крупинов // Врачебное сословие. — 2007. — № 5. — С. 4549.

3. Велиев, Е.И. Оптимизация хирургического лечения больных

локализованным раком предстательной железы: дис. ... докт. мед. наук: 14.01.23 / Велиев Евгений Ибадович — СПб., 2003. - 350 с.

4. Каприн, А.Д. Радикальное лечение больных локализованным и местно- распостраненным раком предстательной железы / А.Д. Каприн, Е.В. Хмелевский, А.В. Фадеев // Вестник Российского Научного Центра рентгенорадиологии. — 2008. —№ 8.

5. Медведев, В. Л. Сравнительный анализ открытой и лапароскопической радикальной простатэктомии в лечении локального рака простаты: дис. ... докт. мед. наук: 14.01.23 / Медведев Владимир Леонидович — М., 2004. - 291 с.

6. Петров, С.Б. Положительный хирургический край при радикальной позадилонной простатэктомии: частота, прогностические факторы, медикаментозная профилактика / С.Б. Петров, С.А. Ракул // Онкоурология.

— 2006. — № 1. — С. 40-44.

7. Пушкарь, Д.Ю. Радикальная простатэктомия: моногр. / Д.Ю. Пушкарь. - М.: МЕДпресс-информ, 2002. - 167 с.

8. Пушкарь, Д. Ю. Диагностика и лечение локализованного рака предстательной железы / Д. Ю. Пушкарь, П. И. Раснер // М.: МЕДпресс- информ, 2008. - 320 с.

9. Ahlering, Т.Е. Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy / Т.Е. Ahlering, L. Eichel, D. Skarecky // Urology.

- 2008. - Vol. 72. - № 6. - P. 1371-1374.

10. Ahlering, Т.В. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / Т.В.

11. Ahmed, K. Observational tools for assessment of procedural skills: a systematic review / K. Ahmed, D. Miskovic, A. Darzi, et al. // Am. J. Surg. - 2011. - Vol. 202. - P. 469-80.

12. Artibani, W. Learning curve and preliminary experience with da Vinci-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / W. Artibani, S. Fracalanza, S. Cavalieri, et al. // Urol. Int. - 2008. - Vol. 80. - № 3. - P. 237-244.

13. Atug, F. Positive surgical margins in robotic- assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic out- comes / F. Atug, E.P. Castle, S.K. Srivastav, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 49. - P. 866-872.

14. Badani, K.K. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures / K.K. Badani, S. Kaul, M. Menon// Cancer. - 2007/ - Vol. 110. - № 9. - P. 1951-1958.

15. Bariol, S.V. Oncological control following laparoscopic nephrouterectomy: 7- year outcome / S.V. Bariol, G.D. Stewart, S.A. McNeill, et al. // J. Urol. - 2004. - Vol. 172. - № 5 (Pt 1). - P. 1805-1808.

16. Bentas, W. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to lap-aroscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up / W. Bentas, M. Wolfram, J. Jones, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2003. - Vol. 44. - № 2. - P. 175-181.

17. Blute, M.L. Anatomic site-specific positive margins in organ-confined prostate cancer and its impact on outcome after radical prostatectomy / M.L. Blute, D.G. Bostwick, E.J. Bergstralh, et al. // Urology. - 1997. - Vol. 50. - № 5. - P. 733739.

18. Burgess, S.V. Cost analysis of radical retropubic, perineal, and robotic prostatectomy / S.V. Burgess, F. Atug, E.P. Castle, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2006. - Vol. 20. - P. 827-830.

19. Catalona, W.J. 5-year tumor recurrence rates after anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy for prostate cancer / W.J. Catalona, D.S. Smith.

20. Cheng, L. Correlation of margin status and extraprostatic extension with progression of prostate carcinoma / L. Cheng, M.F. Darson, E.J. Bergstralh et al. // Cancer. - 1999. - Vol. 86. - № 9. - P. 1775-1782.

21. Davis, J.W. Initial experience of teaching robot-assisted radical prostatectomy to surgeons-in-training: can training be evaluated and standardized / J.W. Davis, A. Kamat, M. Munsell, et al. // BJU Int. - 2010. - Vol. 105. - P. 1148-54.

22. Duchene, D.A. Survey of residency training in laparoscopic and robotic surgery / D.A. Duchene, A. Moinzadeh, I.S. Gill, et al. // J. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 176. - P. 2158 - 2167.

23. Eastham, J.A. Prognostic significance of location of positive margins in radical prostatectomy specimens / J.A. Eastham, K. Kuroiwa, M. Ohori, et al. // Urology. - 2007 - Vol. 70. - № 5. - P. 965-969.

24. Feifer, A. Randomized controlled trial of virtual reality and hybrid simulation for robotic surgical training / A. Feifer, A. Al-Ammari, E. Kovac, et al. // BJU Int. - 2011. - Vol. 108. - P. 1652-1656.

25. Fiedler, M.J. Virtual reality for robotic laparoscopic surgical training / M.J. Fiedler, S.J. Chen, T.N. Judkins, et al. // Stud. Health Technol. Inform. - 2007. - Vol. 125. - P. 127-129.

26. Foell, K. Robotic surgery basic skills training: evaluation of a pilot multidisciplinary simulation-based curriculum / K. Foell, A. Finelli, K. Yasufuku, et al. // Can. Urol. Assoc. J. - 2013. - Vol. 7. - P. 430-434.

27. Gavazzi, A. Face, content and construct validity of a virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery (SEP Robot) / A. Gavazzi, A.N. Bahsoun, W. Van Haute et al. // Ann. R. Col.l Surg. Engl. - 2011. - Vol. 93. - P. 146-50.

28. Gianino, M.M. Critical issues in current com- parative and cost analyses between retropubic and robotic radical prosta- tectomy / M.M. Gianino, M. Galzerano, A. Tizzani, et al. // BJU Int. - 2008. - Vol. 101. - P. 2-3.

29.

30. Grossfeld, G.D. Impact of positive surgical margins on prostate cancer Recurrence and the use of secondary cancer treatment data from the CaPSURE database / G.D. Grossfeld, J.J. Chang, J.M. Broering, et al. // J. Urol. - 2000. - Vol. 163. - № 4. - P. 1171-1177.

31. Guillonneau, B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 240 procedures / B. Guillonneau, F. Rozet, E. Barret, et al. // Urol. Clin. North Am. - 2001. - Vol. 28. - № l. - P. 189-202.

32. Guillonneau, B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations / B. Guillonneau, G. Vallancien. // Prostate. - 1999. - Vol. 39. - № l. - P. 71-75.

33. Guillonneau, B. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique / B. Guillonneau, G. Vallancien // J. Urol. - 2000. - Vol. 163. - № 6. - P. 16431649.

34. Guru, K. In-vivo videos enhance cognitive skilla for da Vinci® Surgical System /

K. Guru, A. Baheti, T. Kesavadas, et al. // J. Urol. - 2009. - Vol. 181. - Suppl. 823.

35. Gupta, R.T. Practice and Quality Improvement: Successful Implementation of TeamSTEPPS Tools Into an Academic Interventional Ultrasound Practice / R.T. Gupta, J.B. Sexton, J. Milne, et al. // AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. - 2015. - Vol. 204.

- № 1. - P. 105-110.

36. Han, M. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience / M. Han, C.R. Partin Awm Pound, J.I. Epstein, et al. // Urol. Clin. North Am. - 2011. - Vol. 28. - № 3. - P. 555-565.

37. Herrell, S.D. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve / S.D. Herrell, J.A. Jr. Smith // Urology. - 2005. - Vol. 66. - Suppl. 5. - P. l05-107.

38. Hull, G.W. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients / G.W.

39. Hung, A.J. Face, content and construct validity of a novel robotic surgery simulator / A.J. Hung, P. Zehnder, M.B. Patil et al. // J. Urol. - 2011. - Vol. 186.

- P. 1019-24.

40. Iwamura, M. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: outcome of initial 12 procedures / M. Iwamura, S. Soh, A. Irie, et al. // Int. J. Urol. - 2004. - Vol. 11. - № 7. - P. 449-455.

41. Janetschek, G. Laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery for small renal cell carcinoma / G. Janetschek, P. Daffner, R. Peschel, et al. // J. Urol. - 1998. - Vol. 159. - № 4. - P. 1152-1155.

42. Jarrett, T.W. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: the first 100 cases / T.W. Jarrett, D.Y. Chan, T.C. Charambura, et al. // J. Urol. - 2002. - Vol. 167. - №3. - P. 12531256.

43. Jonsson, M.N. ProMISTM can serve as a da Vinci® simulator - a construct validity study / M.N. Jonsson, M. Mahmood, T. Askerud et al. // J. Endourol. - 2011. - Vol. 25. - P. 345-350.

44. Joseph, J.V. Robotic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: an alternative approach / J.V. Joseph, R. Rosenbaum, R. Madeb, et al. // J. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 175. - № 3 (Pt 1). - P. 945-950. - discussion 51.

45. Judkins, T.N. Objective evaluation of expert and novice performance during robotic surgical training tasks / T.N. Judkins, D. Oleynikov, N. Stergiou. // Surg. Endosc. - 2009. - Vol. 23. - № 3. - P. 590-597.

46. Katsavelis, D. Validated robotic laparoscopic surgical training in a virtual-reality environment / D. Katsavelis, K.C. Siu, B. Brown-Clerk, et al. // Surg. Endosc. - 2009. - Vol. 23. - P. 66-73.

47. Kavoussi, L.R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: irrational exuberance? / L.R. Kavoussi. // Urology. - 2001. - Vol. 58. - № 4. - P. 503-505.

48. Kenney, P.A. Face, content, and construct validity of dV-trainer, a novel virtual reality simulator for robotic surgery / P.A. Kenney, M.F. Wszolek, J.J. Gould, et al. // Urology.

49. Kesavadas, T. Efficacy of Robotic Surgery Simulator (RoSS) for the da Vinci® Surgical System / T. Kesavadas, A. Kumar, G. Srimathveeravalli et al. // J. Urol.

- 2009. - Vol. 181. - Suppl. 823.

50. Korets, R. Face and construct validity assessment of 2nd generation robotic surgery simulator / R. Korets, J.A. Graversen, A. Mues, et al. // J. Urol. - 2011. - Vol. 185. - Suppl. 488.

51. Korets, R. Comparison of robotic surgery skill acquisition between DV-Trainer and da Vinci surgical system: a randomized controlled study / R. Korets, A.C. Mues, J. Graversen, et al. // J. Urol. - 2011. - Vol. 185. - Suppl. 593.

52. Lein, M. Complications, urinary continence, and oncologic outcome of 1000 laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomies-experience at the Charite Hospital Berlin, Campus Mitte / M. Lein, I. Stibane, R. Mansour, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 50. - № 6. - P. 1278-1282. - discussion 83-84.

53. Lendvay, T.S. VR robotic surgery: randomized blinded study of the dV-Trainer robotic simulator / T.S. Lendvay, P. Casale, R. Sweet, et al. // Stud. Health Technol. Inform. - 2008. - Vol. 132. - P. 242-244.

54. Lerner, M.A. Does training on a virtual reality robotic simulator improve performance on the da Vinci surgical system? / M.A. Lerner, M. Ayalew, W.J. Peine, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2010. - Vol. 24. - P. 467-472.

55. Lotan, Y. Economics of robotics in urology / Y. Lotan // Curr. Opin. Urol. - 2010

- Vol. 20. - P. 92-97.

56. McDonough, P. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance / P. McDonough, A. Peterson, T. Brand // J. Urol. - 2010. - Vol. 183. - Suppl. 515.

57. Menon, M. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes / M. Menon, A. Shrivastava, A. Tewari, et al. // J. Urol. - 2002. - Vol. l68. - № 3. - P. 945-949.

58. Moore, R.G. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases / R.G. Moore, T.D. Averch, P.G. Schulam, et al. // J. Urol. - 1997. - Vol. 157. - № 2. - P. 459-462.

59. Mottrie, A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: oncologic and functional results of 184 cases / A. Mottrie, P. Van Migem, G. De Naeyer, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2007. - Vol. 52. - № 3. - P. 746-750.

60. Murphy, D.G. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008 / D.G. Murphy, R. Hall, R. Tong, et al. // ANZ J. Surg. - 2008. - Vol. 78. - № 12. - P. 1076-1081.

61. Murphy, D.G. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up / D.G. Murphy, M. Kerger, H. Crowe, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2009. - Vol. 55. - № 6. - P. 1358-1366.

62. Narazaki, K. Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency / K. Narazaki, D. Oleynikov, N. Stergiou // Surg. Endosc. - 2006. - Vol. 20. - № 1. - P. 96-103.

63. Neary, P.C. Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons / P.C. Neary, E. Boyle, C.P. Delaney, et al. // Surg. Endosc. - 2008. - Vol. 22. - P. 2301-2309.

64. Osborne, M.P. William Stewart Halsted: his life and contributions to surgery / M.P. Osborne // Lancet Oncol. - 2007. - Vol. 8. - № 3. - P. 256-265.

65. Pardalidis, N.P. Endoscopic and laparoscopic treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction / N.P. Pardalidis, A.G. Papatsoris, E.V. Kosmaoglou // J. Urol. - 2002. - Vol. 168. - № 5. - P. 1937-1940. - discussion 40.

66. Patel, V.R. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases / V.R. Patel, K.J. Palmer, G. Coughlin, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2008. - Vol. 22. - № 10. - P. 2299-2305.

67. Patel, V.R. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases / V.R. Patel, R. Thaly, K. Shah // BJU Int. - 2007. - Vol. 99. - № 5. - P. 1109-1112.

68. Paul, A. Oncologic outcome after extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: midterm follow-up of 1115 procedures / A. Paul, G. Ploussard, N. Nicolaiew, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 20l0. - Vol. 57. - № 2. - P. 267-272.

69. Pellen, M.G. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator / M.G. Pellen, L.F. Horgan, J.R. Barton, et al. // Surg. Endosc. - 2009. - Vol. 23. - P. 130-139.

70. Poulakis, V. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using an extraperitoneal approach: Nordwest hospital technique and initial experience in 255 cases / V. Poulakis, N. Ferakis, W. Dillenburg, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2006. - Vol. 20. - №

I. - P. 45-53.

71. Raman, J.D. Robotic radical prostatectomy: operative technique, outcomes, and learning curve / J.D. Raman, S. Dong, A. Levinson, et al. // JSLS. - 2007. - Vol.

II. - № l. - P. l-7.

72. Rashid, H.H. Robotic surgical education: a systematic approach to training urology residents to perform robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy / H.H. Rashid, Y.Y. Leung, M.J. Rashid, et al. // Urology. - 2006. - Vol. 68. - № l.

- P. 75-79.

73. Samadi, D. From proficiency to expert, when does the learning curve for robotic- assisted prostatectomies plateau? The Columbia University experience / D. Samadi, A. Levinson, A. Hakimi, et al. // World J. Urol. - 2007. - Vol. 25. - № 1.

- P. 105-110.

74. Scales, C.D. Jr. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy / C.D. Jr. Scales, P.J. Jones, E.L. Eisenstein, et al. // J. Urol. - 2005. - Vol. 174. - P. 2323- 2329.

75. Schuessler, W.W. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial case report [abstract 130] / W.W. Schuessler, L.R. Kavoussi, R.V. Clayman, et al. // J. Urol. - 1992. - Vol. 147. - P. 246A.

76. Schuessler, W.W. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience / W.W. Schuessler, P.G. Schulam, R.V. Clayman, et al. // Urology. - 1997. - Vol. 50. - № 6. - P. 854-857.

77. Scott, DJ. Laparoscopic training on bench models: better and more cost effective than operating room experience? / D.J. Scott, P.C. Bergen, R.V. Rege, et al. // J. Am. Coll. Surg. - 2000. - Vol. 191. - № 3. - P. 272-283.

78. Sethi, A.S. Validation of a novel virtual reality robotic simulator / A.S. Sethi, W.J. Peine, Y. Mohammadi, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2009. - Vol. 23. - P. 503-508.

79. Seixas-Mikelus, S.A. Face validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator / S.A. Seixas-Mikelus, T. Kesavadas, G. Srimathveeravalli, et al. // Urology. - 2010. - Vol. 76. - P. 357-60.

80. Seixas-Mikelus, S.A. Content validation of a novel robotic surgical simulator / S.A. Seixas-Mikelus, A.P. Stegemann, T. Kesavadas, et al. // BJU Int. - 2011 - Vol. 107. - P. 1130-1135.

81. Smith, R. Fundamentals of robotic surgery: a course of basic robotic surgery skills based upon a 14-society consensus template of outcomes measures and curriculum development / R. Smith, V. Patel, R. Satava // Int. J. Med. Robot. - 2014. - Vol. 10. - P. 379-384.

82. Sofer, M. Risk of positive margins and biochemical recurrence in relation to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy / M. Sofer, K.L. Hamilton-Nelson, J.J. Schlesselman, et al. // J. Clin. Oncol. - 2002. - Vol. 20. - № 7. - P. 1853-1858.

83. Stegemann, A.P. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: a multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum / A.P. Stegemann, K. Ahmed, J.R. Syed, et al. // Urology. - 2013. - Vol. 81. - P. 76774.

84. Steinberg, P.L. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy / P.L. Steinberg, P.A. Merguerian, W. Bihrle 3rd, et al. // Urology. - 2008. - Vol. 72. - P. 1068-1072.

85. Sundaram, C.P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction / C.P. Sundaram, R.L. Grubb 3rd, J. Rehman, et al. // J. Urol. - 2003. - Vol. 169. - № 6. - P. 2037-2040.

86. Tewari, AK. Visual cues as a surrogate for tactile feedback during robotic- assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: posterolateral margin rates in 1340 consecutive patients / A.K. Tewari, N.D. Patel, R.A. Leung, et al. // BJU Int. - 2010. - Vol. 106. - P. 528 - 536.

87. White, M.A. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? / M.A. White, A.P. De Haan, D.D. Stephens, et al. // Urology. - 2009. - Vol. 73. - № 3. - P. 567-571.

88. Van der Meijden, O.A. The SEP ‘Robot’: a valid virtual reality robotic simulator for the da vinci surgical system? / O.A. Van der Meijden, I.A. Broeders, M.P. Schijven // Surg. Technol. Int. - 2010. - Vol. 19. - P. 51-58.

89. Van der Vleuten, C. The assessment of professional competence: developments, research and practical implications / C. Van der Vleuten // Adv. Health Sci. Educ. Theory Pract. - 1996. - Vol. 1. - P. 41-67.

90. Wetzel, S. Selection of patients for carotid thromboendarterectomy: the role of magnetic resonance angiography / S. Wetzel, M. Boos, G. Bongartz, et al. // J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. - 1999. - Vol. 23. - Suppl. 1. - P. 91-94.

91. Yossepowitch, O. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy: outlining the problem and its long-term consequences / O. Yossepowitch, A. Bjartell, J.A. Eastham, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2009. - Vol. 55. - № l. - P. 97-99.

92. Zorn, К.С. Da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single institution experience on a single three-arm robot unit of more than 700 consecutive robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies / К.С. Zorn, O.N. Gofrit, M.A. Orvieto, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2007. - Vol. 21. - № 11. - P. 1341-1344.

93. Zorn, K.C. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon / K.C. Zorn, M.A. Orvieto, E.M. Gong, et al. // J. Endourol. - 2007. - Vol. 21. - № 4. - P. 441-447.

94. Zovera, A.T. Robotic radical prostatectomy with "Veil of Aphrodite" technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing / A.T. Zovera, S. Kaul, K. Badani, et al. // Eur. Urol. - 2006. - Vol. 49. - № 6. - P. 1065-1073; discussion 73-74.